AI Summary
Sign in to listen

DraftKings successfully closes on $700m term loan B facility, $750m revolving credit facility

The new revolving facility replaces the operator’s existing $500m senior secured revolving credit facility, originally scheduled to mature during November 2029.

2 min read
DraftKings finance
Key Points
According to DraftKings, the term loan B was increased to $700m from the original $600m amount due to ‘strong demand’
DraftKings intends to use borrowings from the new $750m revolving credit facility for ‘general corporate purposes’

DraftKings has successfully closed on a previously reported $700m senior secured term loan B credit facility and $750m revolving credit facility, which will be utilized for repurchasing a portion of convertible notes issued by DraftKings Holdings and “general corporate purposes.” 

The new revolving facility replaces the operator’s existing $500m senior secured revolving credit facility, originally scheduled to mature during November 2029. The updated facility will provide revolving loans, swing line borrowings and letters of credit of up to $750m, set to mature in August 2031.

According to DraftKings, the term loan B was increased to $700m from the original $600m amount due to “strong demand” and will mature in August 2033. 

The new closures were reported after DraftKings released its financial results for the second quarter of 2026 and first-half period, having witnessed a net loss of $67.6m during Q2 and a revenue decrease of 4.6% to just over $1.44bn.

Despite the results, DraftKings Co-Founder and CEO Jason Robins highlighted growth across monthly unique players (MUPs) for DraftKings, which increased 9% for Q2 to 3.6 million customers.

“We delivered a strong second quarter and enter the back half of the year with real momentum, as our core business grew across handle, users and engagement,” Robins said. 

“Our Super App is now live nationwide, and Predictions is already growing faster than we anticipated. The similarity of Predictions customer metrics to Sportsbook customer metrics, our advantaged LTV position and our playbook to innovate on a leading Predictions offering all underpin our confidence that we can win the category this NFL season and beyond.”

For the H1 period, DraftKings’ net revenue increased 5.8% to nearly $3.09bn, while adjusted EBITDA fell by 30% to $282.5m. The operator reported a net loss of more than $46.5m for the period, following a net income of $124.1m during the first half of 2025.

Good to know

On August 11, DraftKings made efforts to expand its parlay offering on DKeX ahead of the 2026-2027 NFL season, having self-certified multi-leg event contract wagers and nine football contracts

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
tribal-predict

The Tribal sector won’t back down against predictions – but at what cost?

The Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association reiterated its sector’s anti-prediction market stance this week. Yet the Kalshi x Tribal partnerships that sparked the association’s statement paint a vivid picture of fragmentation slicing right through the US gaming ecosystem.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood
sten andersen

Sten Andersen: Gambling can cross the line, but our industry leads on player protection

The ATG Chief Innovation & Future Affairs Officer speaks exclusively to Global Gaming Insider on a recent panel topic of UX, game design, player psychology and "dark patterns."

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
G2E second analysis 1

Gaming not forgotten: What may have went unseen at G2E 2026

While prediction markets dominated conversation at the tradeshow, additional headlines still made the rounds in Las Vegas – including discussions surrounding RG and operator-regulator collaboration…

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
CFTC definitions
[SIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE]

CFTC confirms casino-style gambling products are ‘excluded’ from swap definition

The Commission stated wagers placed on sportsbooks and casino games would not be included in the definition, instead referring to sports event contracts as ‘financial instruments.’

· Legal & Regulatory + 5