AI Summary
Sign in to listen

Loto-Québec issues public notice regarding prediction market growth

The public notice follows recent awareness raised by the Canadian Securities Administrators, while Loto-Québec also believes prediction markets have ‘grown significantly’ in North America.

1 min read
Loto Quebec Predictions
Key Points
Within the notice, Loto-Québec reminded players across the province that ‘if it’s not Loto-Québec, it’s not legal’
On 26 August, Kalshi was sued by the State of Connecticut, which is seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement, restitution and civil penalties

Loto-Québec has issued a public notice to remind bettors across the province that prediction markets are “not legal,” and to warn residents there are “real risks regarding the integrity of the results.”

“Regardless of the platform – whether it's a gaming website or a prediction market website offering event contracts related to sports and entertainment – if it's not Loto-Québec, it's not legal,” the notice said. 

“Over the past year, the popularity of prediction markets offering sports and entertainment event contracts has grown significantly in North America. However, it is important to remember that this form of betting is not legal in Québec and that there are real risks regarding the integrity of the results.

"In light of this, Loto-Québec encourages Québec players to choose… the only legal, safe and trustworthy option available in the province, and to bet responsibly.”

The public notice follows recent awareness raised by the Canadian Securities Administrators, as well as the growth of operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket over the past 12 months. 

Canada recently expanded its gaming presence following the launch of Alberta’s fully regulated online gambling market, representing just the second province to do so along with Ontario. 

As recently as 26 August, Kalshi was sued by the State of Connecticut for “operating an illegal sports wagering service,” as regulators are seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement, restitution and civil penalties from the enforcement action. 

The lawsuit comes after a federal court in Connecticut chose to deny Kalshi’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the state’s Department of Consumer Protection on 10 August, ruling that sports-event contracts cannot be defined as “swaps” under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Kalshi originally filed a lawsuit against the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection in December 2025 after receiving a cease-and-desist order from the regulator.

Good to know

Kalshi filed for an emergency injunction in Utah on 17 August, having suffered a legal setback after a federal judge ruled the state has authority to enforce its gambling laws over prediction markets

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
tribal-predict

The Tribal sector won’t back down against predictions – but at what cost?

The Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association reiterated its sector’s anti-prediction market stance this week. Yet the Kalshi x Tribal partnerships that sparked the association’s statement paint a vivid picture of fragmentation slicing right through the US gaming ecosystem.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood
sten andersen

Sten Andersen: Gambling can cross the line, but our industry leads on player protection

The ATG Chief Innovation & Future Affairs Officer speaks exclusively to Global Gaming Insider on a recent panel topic of UX, game design, player psychology and "dark patterns."

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
G2E second analysis 1

Gaming not forgotten: What may have went unseen at G2E 2026

While prediction markets dominated conversation at the tradeshow, additional headlines still made the rounds in Las Vegas – including discussions surrounding RG and operator-regulator collaboration…

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
CFTC definitions
[SIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE]

CFTC confirms casino-style gambling products are ‘excluded’ from swap definition

The Commission stated wagers placed on sportsbooks and casino games would not be included in the definition, instead referring to sports event contracts as ‘financial instruments.’

· Legal & Regulatory + 5