AI Summary
Sign in to listen

Argentinian bingo ordered to honor disputed slot machine win

A Bahía Blanca civil court ruled that the operator must bear the risk of technical faults and added damages for banning the player from the venue after he claimed the prize.

2 min read
Argentina
Key Points
A judge ordered a bingo to pay for the ticket printed by a slot machine four years ago, adjusted for inflation plus interest, after the operator called it a system error
The court also awarded moral damages and punitive damages over the ban on the player's entry, and ordered the ban lifted

A civil court in Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, has ordered a bingo hall to honor a slot machine ticket after the operator refused to pay, arguing that the amount was the result of a technical error.

The court ruled that the risks associated with technical failures in gaming equipment fall on the operator rather than the player, applying Argentina’s consumer protection rules to the dispute.

The disputed ticket was worth ARS 22.9m ($16,500).

The judge applied consumer protection law and found that the company failed to prove the ticket resulted from a specific fault in the machine's system.

The court ordered the original prize to be paid, adjusted for inflation from August 2022 until payment, plus interest. With the adjustments and damages included, the total amount could reach ARS 40m.

The judge also awarded ARS 5m in moral damages and ARS 4.3m in punitive damages for the ban on the player's entry, which the court described as retaliatory and discriminatory. 

The ban must end immediately, and the defendants must pay legal costs. The operator is also expected to deposit the full amount of the ruling before it can file any appeal.

The dispute began on August 13, 2022, when a regular customer's play on a slot machine printed two tickets, one for ARS 10,000 and another for the larger amount. Staff paid only the smaller ticket and said the second was a machine error. 

The bingo offered him ARS 125,000 and later ARS 250,000. He rejected both and demanded full payment, after which the venue banned him.

In court, the operator argued that the ticket was invalid because of a malfunction and that the machine's maximum prize was about ARS 125,000. The ruling is a first-instance decision.

Argentinian courts have addressed similar disputes: In 2016, the Mercedes civil and commercial appeals court annulled a settlement.

The operator of Bingo Chivilcoy paid a player about 5% of an ARS 999,999.95 slot prize won in 2007, citing a machine error, and ordered the full prize paid plus moral damages.

Good to know

Argentina's inflation rate has reached around 1,247% since the ticket was issued in August 2022

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
A slap in the face - Industry reacts

“A slap in the face” – Gambling industry reacts to Brazil ban

From regulatory experts to CEOs, the sector’s verdict is in: President Lula's ban on online gambling and sports betting will create a litany of problems for the country.

4 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
brazil sports

Brazil betting ban: Why the industry must learn lessons on a global scale

While many in our industry described an online gambling ban as an impossibility in Brazil, public fervor and national media coverage suggested it was likely all along. The sector must now acknowledge it has played this one all wrong.

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
slotegrator-analysis

Beyond the turnkey model: Slotegrator on the future of online casino

Global Gambling Insider speaks with Slotegrator CPO Alexandra Mouton to find out more about modern platform software and how operators can truly differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood

In The News

View All
Argentina
[STANDARD IMPORTANCE]

Argentinian bingo ordered to honor disputed slot machine win

A Bahía Blanca civil court ruled that the operator must bear the risk of technical faults and added damages for banning the player from the venue after he claimed the prize.

· Financial + 2