News

Half of Brazil's bettors are playing outside the rules and they know it

New research shows most Brazilian bettors have used betting platforms that skip required safeguards like facial recognition, with half admitting to at least two irregular practices.

· 2 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Sad bettor
Key Points
77% of bettors admit at least one irregular practice in the past three months
50% admit two or more, the threshold researchers use to classify "illegal bettors"
77% of bettors agree that combating illegal betting sites should be a government priority

A survey by Instituto Locomotiva found that 77% of Brazilian bettors admit to at least one irregular practice while betting over the past three months.

Indeed, half of the bettors actually admitted to two or more, the threshold researchers use to classify someone as an "illegal bettor." 

That share has actually eased slightly, down from 62% in the first half of 2025 and 55% in the second half of last year.

The study tracked four practices banned under rules the Secretariat of Prizes and Bets (SPA) has enforced since 2024: betting on sites without facial recognition, using platforms not ending in "bet.br," and funding bets via credit card or crypto. 

The first two were the most common violations, cited by 53% and 48% of bettors respectively. 

Despite the high violation rate, awareness of the risk is nearly universal

77% of bettors agree illegal platforms skip responsible gambling safeguards and are more dangerous, and 63% say the government could still do more to shut them down, a view shared even by 58% of bettors who admit using illegal sites themselves. 

"The study reveals a slight reduction in illegal betting, but it remains high, with half of Brazilian bettors moving through the unlicensed market," said Instituto Locomotiva president Renato Meirelles.

On the matter, Amilton Noble, CEO of Hebara, a Brazilian company which distributes products for the country's lottery sector, argued the numbers make the case for tighter regulation rather than prohibition, writing that illegal platforms have attractive features like higher odds.

“Illegal gambling practices, which fly under the radar, are far more harmful to bettors than regulated sites, which can be monitored and punished,” he said.

“Treating illegal gambling the same way as legal gambling is like treating two completely different problems with the same medicine. It doesn't work and only worsens the ‘pain’ because it doesn't address the actual problem."

​​Noble has previously contributed to Global Gaming Insider.

Good to know

The survey conducted 2,291 interviews in Brazil this year, with a margin of error of 2.1 percentage points

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
macauq3big6

What Q3 financials from the 'big six' tell us about Macau's future

Following years of consistent post-Covid financial recovery, Macau's monthly revenue has declined five months running. With results from the big six now on the table, Global Gaming Insider investigates the growing disconnect between revenue, profitability and those who bucked the trend.

7 min read • • By Will Underwood
DraftKings Sportsbook

DraftKings stock down 27%: Why CEO is defending high predictions spend

During DraftKings' quarterly earnings call, Jason Robins emphasized "discipline and efficiency," coupled with a quick return on the operator's predictions investment with the operator #3 in the market. All with a July 2028 Supreme Court date in mind...

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
GammaSweep Interview: Compliance 2

GammaSweep: Why operators need a more proactive approach to compliance

Gaming firms need to incorporate compliance into their foundation, rather than responding to regulatory changes when they arise.

9 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis

In The News

View All