AI Summary
Sign in to listen

Betting advertisers find footballing allies in Corinthians, Palmeiras and São Paulo 

The city's three biggest football clubs are tracking a bill that would restrict betting advertising at São Paulo events, warning it could put local teams at a competitive disadvantage.

1 min read
Project
Key Points
Corinthians, Palmeiras and São Paulo are jointly monitoring a bill restricting betting ads at São Paulo events
The three clubs together receive roughly BR350m ($68.6m) a year in fixed shirt sponsorship revenue from betting brands

Corinthians, Palmeiras and São Paulo have begun coordinating to track a bill under review at São Paulo's City Council that would restrict betting advertising at sports and other events in the city.

The clubs mention the bill’s potential impact on the clubs' sponsorship revenue. Filed by Councillor João Jorge, the bill received a favorable legality opinion from the council's Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ), advancing it further in the legislative process.

The three clubs together receive an estimated BR350m a year in fixed revenue from main sponsorships displayed on their jerseys, a figure that can rise further through bonus clauses, prize incentives and other forms of commercial exposure, including stadium advertising. 

The bill would restrict betting ads at sporting and other events held in São Paulo, regardless of whether they're organized by the public sector or by private or nonprofit entities, covering both professional and amateur activities across public and private venues. 

Recently, even amid the uncertainty, Betano announced the renewal of its sponsorship of the Campeonato Paulista Feminino for a second consecutive season.

Cited formats include signage, banners and panels installed at sports venues. 

"If clubs in the city of São Paulo lose betting brand revenue, one of their main sources of income, while rivals in other states keep it, the disparity will show up on the pitch," said São Paulo Football Federation President Reinaldo Carneiro Bastos.

"A rule restricted to us will weaken clubs in the face of national and international competitors and directly compromise their ability to compete for titles." 

Good to know

Proposed penalties include fines of BR50,000 and the possibility of barring organizers from holding events for up to two years

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
tribal-predict

The Tribal sector won’t back down against predictions – but at what cost?

The Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association reiterated its sector’s anti-prediction market stance this week. Yet the Kalshi x Tribal partnerships that sparked the association’s statement paint a vivid picture of fragmentation slicing right through the US gaming ecosystem.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood
sten andersen

Sten Andersen: Gambling can cross the line, but our industry leads on player protection

The ATG Chief Innovation & Future Affairs Officer speaks exclusively to Global Gaming Insider on a recent panel topic of UX, game design, player psychology and "dark patterns."

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
G2E second analysis 1

Gaming not forgotten: What may have went unseen at G2E 2026

While prediction markets dominated conversation at the tradeshow, additional headlines still made the rounds in Las Vegas – including discussions surrounding RG and operator-regulator collaboration…

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
CFTC definitions
[SIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE]

CFTC confirms casino-style gambling products are ‘excluded’ from swap definition

The Commission stated wagers placed on sportsbooks and casino games would not be included in the definition, instead referring to sports event contracts as ‘financial instruments.’

· Legal & Regulatory + 5