News

CFTC denies Kalshi’s attempt to cancel Michigan trades following temporary restraining order

Kalshi representatives have stated the operator is reviewing the CFTC’s order and continues to consider its next plan of action, while regulators in Michigan are yet to comment on the matter.

· 2 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
CFTC Michigan
Key Points
Ingham County Circuit Court granted Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel a temporary restraining order against Kalshi on June 29
CFTC Chairman Michael Selig believes ‘canceling trades that have already been executed is an unprecedented step that risks a cascading effect’

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) “exercised its authority to stay an emergency rule change proposed by Kalshi,” blocking the operator from cancelling trades in Michigan despite being ordered to cease such activity on June 29. 

“A state cannot force a DCM to violate its obligations, and federal law does not permit a DCM to discriminate against a state’s residents,” CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said. 

“Canceling trades that have already been executed is an unprecedented step that risks a cascading effect on the entire marketplace and undermines the certainty in contracting that is a necessary component of a functioning market. The Commission will not allow states or state courts to bully registered entities into violating the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations.”

Following the denial, Kalshi representatives stated the operator is currently reviewing the CFTC’s order and continues to consider its next plan of action. Michigan regulators, including the Gaming Control Board (MGCB), have yet to comment on the matter. 

Kalshi moved to cancel trades in Michigan after the Ingham County Circuit Court granted Attorney General Dana Nessel a temporary restraining order against the operator, following her original enforcement action filed on March 4.

Kalshi unsuccessfully attempted to move the case to the federal level after Nessel’s motion to remand the lawsuit to state court was approved by the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan on June 25.

“Our gambling laws exist to protect Michiganders from unlicensed, predatory operations, and failing to comply with them carries serious legal consequences,” Nessel said. 

“I am proud of the attorneys in my office who not only kept this case in state court but also secured an order protecting residents as this litigation moves forward. We remain committed to enforcing a level playing field for all gambling platforms in Michigan and ensuring that companies cannot evade accountability or exploit consumers under the guise of a prediction market.”

The temporary restraining order also called for Kalshi to implement geolocation services to ensure compliance with the enforcement action, although it remains unclear as to whether the operator will do so given the CFTC’s interference. 

Good to know

The MGCB approved DraftKings for a multi-state launch of its online poker platform on July 13, previously determining the operator met all regulatory requirements to conduct such activity

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
rob jones brazil

Rob Jones: What Brazil can learn from Spain, Italy and the Netherlands

The regulatory expert, a previous CLO and director at Entain, Pinnacle, Playnetic and more, says he advised caution about entering Brazil. But he remains optimistic about the country’s long-term betting future.

13 min read • • By Tim Poole
ntiacombined

NTIA Panel: The casino industry’s economic impact in times of uncertainty

The NTIA, in association with the BGC and Hippodrome Casino, explores the economic and social contribution of Britain's casinos, the potential impact of changes to Machine Games Duty and societal contributions beyond gaming.

6 min read • • By Will Underwood
Kalshi Supreme Court Analysis

Will Kalshi’s legal battle reach the US Supreme Court?

With states, Tribal interests, gaming industry groups and the NFL rallying behind New Jersey, the fight over sports prediction markets is gaining momentum. Could mounting legal pressure and conflicting court rulings persuade the US Supreme Court to intervene?

5 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic

In The News

View All