AI Summary
Sign in to listen

ESMA warns prediction markets face heightened insider trading risk

The EU financial regulator says crypto use, institutional expansion and event-specific information create growing surveillance and manipulation challenges for prediction markets.

2 min read
ESMA
Key Points
ESMA says prediction markets present increased insider trading and manipulation risks
Crypto transactions may make suspicious activity more difficult to detect
Exchanges and investment funds are showing greater interest in prediction-market partnerships

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has warned that the expansion of prediction markets is increasing the risk of insider trading and market manipulation.

In its risk assessment, the EU financial regulator said a number of incidents indicated that prediction markets were vulnerable to trading based on non-public information.

Users can take positions on real-world outcomes including elections, sports and armed conflicts. ESMA said the use of cryptoassets on such platforms can make it harder to identify and prevent insider trading, wash trading and coordinated manipulation.

The regulator also highlighted increasing institutional interest in the sector, with exchanges, investment funds and other financial-market infrastructure businesses seeking commercial partnerships with prediction-market operators.

The comments formed part of a broader assessment of risks across European financial markets. ESMA described operational risks as very high and increasing, citing cyber threats and the ability of artificial intelligence to identify and exploit technological vulnerabilities.

The authority also repeated concerns that shocks in crypto markets could spread into the wider financial system as connections between digital assets and traditional finance increase.

Tokenised equities remain negligible when compared with global stock markets, according to ESMA, although adoption is growing and may affect market structures.

Separately, Chair Verena Ross warned of a widening gap between elevated asset valuations and a weakening economic outlook. She cited geopolitical tensions, conflict in the Middle East and higher energy prices as factors that could contribute to an abrupt market correction.

For prediction-market businesses and prospective institutional partners, ESMA’s findings add to questions concerning product classification, market surveillance and the controls required to identify conflicts of interest and suspicious trading.

ESMA previously advised prediction-market operators to assess whether their event contracts fall within EU restrictions on binary options. Depending on their structure, the products may be treated as financial instruments or as bets under national gambling laws. 

Good to know

Event contracts classified as financial instruments in the EU may be subject to existing national restrictions covering binary options

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
Welfare Bans Gambling

Gambling and welfare: Where should regulators draw the line?

As regulators face growing questions over how to protect financially vulnerable players, welfare recipient-based gambling restrictions emerge in Europe.

4 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic
brazil bird

Brazil: Is an online gambling ban realistic – and how might it look?

A full online gaming ban looks unlikely, but Brazil has plenty of options between doing nothing and shutting the industry down.

5 min read • • By Layla Victoria
super app analysis

SuperApps in an uncertain future: What next for DraftKings, Fanatics and FanDuel?

After Fanatics' recent launch, the era of sports betting, prediction market and iGaming SuperApps has nearly reached its apex, potentially determining new market leaders – at least in two of those categories...

4 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
Denmark
[ELEVATED IMPORTANCE]

Denmark expands AML duties for gambling operators

From 15 September, gambling operators must assess proliferation-financing risks, strengthen sanctions controls and introduce independent testing of their compliance frameworks.

· Legal & Regulatory + 5