News

Federal prosecutors probe whether Brazil's self-exclusion tool actually works

Brazil's Federal Public Prosecutor's Office has opened a civil inquiry into whether bettors who requested self-exclusion can still access licensed betting platforms.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Investigation
Key Points
MPF converted a preliminary notice into a formal civil inquiry examining the self-exclusion system's effectiveness
Operators have up to 72 hours to block an user across all channels once notified

Brazil's Federal Public Prosecutor's Office (MPF) has converted a preliminary inquiry into a formal civil investigation examining possible failures in the self-exclusion system used by betting platforms. 

The probe aims to determine whether users who requested a block on their own CPF, the individual taxpayer number in Brazil, can still access authorized platforms. Opening the inquiry doesn't itself confirm any wrongdoing but places the mechanism's real-world effectiveness under direct scrutiny.

Finance Minister Dario Durigan recently said the Centralized Self-Exclusion Platform has logged more than 1.2 million requests already.

Brazil's Centralized Self-Exclusion Platform is designed to block existing accounts, prevent new sign-ups, and stop targeted advertising and under SPA guidelines, operators receive the exclusion request automatically and have up to 72 hours to execute the block. 

The challenge, as the investigation frames it, isn't simply offering the feature but ensuring the request travels correctly through the entire system: registration via the official Government website, CPF identification, blocking across every platform environment, preventing re-registration, halting ad campaigns and preserving records showing the block was carried out. 

That requires reconciling data across systems, handling duplicate records, monitoring integration failures, and clearly assigning responsibility between operators and third parties, since affiliates, CRM platforms, identity verification systems and marketing partners all need to respond to the same exclusion command. 

Privacy is also a factor: handling CPF data tied to self-exclusion requires strict purpose limitation, security, restricted access and traceability, so the protective tool doesn't become a new source of exposure for the user.

“Responsible gaming needs to be evaluated by its ability to produce the expected result. Written policy, available buttons and declared integration are not enough when blocking is not effective across all channels,” added industry group ABC-Bet.

Good to know

The self-exclusion platform was developed by the SPA and has been available since December 2025

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
macauq3big6

What Q3 financials from the 'big six' tell us about Macau's future

Following years of consistent post-Covid financial recovery, Macau's monthly revenue has declined five months running. With results from the big six now on the table, Global Gaming Insider investigates the growing disconnect between revenue, profitability and those who bucked the trend.

7 min read • • By Will Underwood
DraftKings Sportsbook

DraftKings stock down 27%: Why CEO is defending high predictions spend

During DraftKings' quarterly earnings call, Jason Robins emphasized "discipline and efficiency," coupled with a quick return on the operator's predictions investment with the operator #3 in the market. All with a July 2028 Supreme Court date in mind...

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
GammaSweep Interview: Compliance 2

GammaSweep: Why operators need a more proactive approach to compliance

Gaming firms need to incorporate compliance into their foundation, rather than responding to regulatory changes when they arise.

9 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis

In The News

View All