News

Betting lawsuits in Rio de Janeiro surge by more than 1,000% in two years

Cases involving unpaid winnings, frozen accounts and disputed betting terms have climbed sharply as Brazil’s gambling sector faces mounting legal and regulatory pressure.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Rio lawsuits
Key Points
Betting-related lawsuits at the Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice rose from 58 in 2024 to 689 in 2026, an increase of 1,087%
Players are seeking more than $3.7m in total from companies behind Betano, Bet365 and 7K Bet
A Brazilian judge has called for stronger safeguards and prevention measures to limit the social costs associated with gambling

The number of lawsuits involving online betting at the Rio de Janeiro Court of Justice (TJRJ) has increased by 1,087% in two years, rising from 58 cases in 2024 to 689 in 2026.

The disputes cover a range of issues, including winnings allegedly left unpaid, changes to betting odds, blocked accounts and withdrawals, and contractual clauses considered abusive by players. 

The increase comes amid growing scrutiny of Brazil’s gambling market, following the Federal Government’s measure prohibiting the operation, offering and advertising of online betting and games across the country.

The companies facing the largest number of cases at the Rio court are Kaizen Gaming Brasil, HS do Brasil and Ana Gaming Brasil, which operate the Betano, Bet365 and 7K Bet brands, respectively. Collectively, bettors are seeking more than BR20m ($3.7m) from the three companies.

Ana Gaming said the volume of lawsuits reflects the scale of its operations and active user base, rather than the merits or outcomes of individual cases. 

The company added that it presents its defence in proceedings and complies with all judicial decisions. 

Peterson Barroso Simão, a judge on the TJRJ’s Second Criminal Chamber, said the scale of gambling activity made its effects on the courts unsurprising. 

“We have to recognize that certain practices can produce risks that require information, advertising limits, protection mechanisms and stricter oversight. This has been the case at various points in history,” he said.

He also noted that establishing a direct legal link between betting platforms and longer-term consequences, such as mounting debt, family breakdown and worsening psychological problems, can be difficult.

Good to know

Besides Ana Gaming, the other mentioned companies didn’t comment on it

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
ntiacombined

NTIA Panel: The casino industry’s economic impact in times of uncertainty

The NTIA, in association with the BGC and Hippodrome Casino, explores the economic and social contribution of Britain's casinos, the potential impact of changes to Machine Games Duty and societal contributions beyond gaming.

6 min read • • By Will Underwood
Kalshi Supreme Court Analysis

Will Kalshi’s legal battle reach the US Supreme Court?

With states, Tribal interests, gaming industry groups and the NFL rallying behind New Jersey, the fight over sports prediction markets is gaining momentum. Could mounting legal pressure and conflicting court rulings persuade the US Supreme Court to intervene?

5 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic
udo seckelmann

Udo Seckelmann: Betting has "long-term future" in Brazil, but Government has "damaged credibility"

In the third of our exclusive Brazil interviews this week, the gambling lawyer provides our most pro-industry viewpoint yet. Indeed, he argues that regulatory instability will benefit no one, and that politics should be separated from "legitimate concerns."

6 min read • • By Tim Poole

In The News

View All