AI Summary
Sign in to listen

Anti-sweepstakes legislation advanced by Indiana House of Representatives

House Bill 1052 was originally brought forth by Indiana Representative Ethan Manning and bans online sweepstakes games which leverage dual-currency or multi-currency systems of payment.

3 min read
Anti-sweepstakes legislation advanced by Indiana House of Representatives
Key Points
Indiana’s House voted 87-11 to advance HB 1052 to the state Senate, but removed a provision that would have criminalized sweepstakes operations
Offenders would now be subject to a civic penalty of $100,000, which can be levied against either an individual or operator

The Indiana House of Representatives has voted 87-11 in favor of advancing House Bill 1052 to the state Senate, but amended the anti-sweepstakes legislation to remove a provision which would have criminalized the operation of sweepstakes games. 

HB 1052 was originally brought forth by Indiana Representative Ethan Manning in December 2025 and prohibits online sweepstakes games which leverage dual-currency or multi-currency systems of payment.

The House also amended HB 1052’s language to include "multi-currency" payments, given the previous iteration only featured language referring to dual-currency systems of payment for sweepstakes operations. 

Instead of enforcing criminal action, SB 1052 would now subject either an operator or individual to a civic penalty of $100,000, as the legislation is one of few in the US to not include penalties for affiliates or suppliers working with sweepstakes platforms. 

On January 23, the Indiana House Public Policy Committee unanimously voted to pass HB 1052, but was the first to issue an amendment which downgraded proposed criminal penalties to the civic level. 

In response to HB 1052’s approval, Social Gaming Leadership Alliance (SGLA) Managing Director Sean Ostrow released a statement calling for “sensible regulation” of sweepstakes casinos rather than a legal ban.

“Social Plus games have been operating lawfully in Indiana since 2012 and are enjoyed by hundreds of thousands of Hoosiers,” Ostrow said. 

“Rather than a ban that would criminalize law-abiding businesses while doing nothing to stop illegal operators, we believe sensible regulation is the pragmatic pathway forward.”

The Association has proposed a regulatory framework that it projects would generate over $20m in annual revenue for Indiana while enforcing “strict age verification, data privacy and responsible gameplay protections.”

The SGLA previously submitted testimony regarding HB 1052 on January 6, describing the legislation as an "overly broad attempt" to safeguard residents from "bad actors" in social plus gaming.

Good to know

The Maryland Senate Budget and Tax Committee prefiled Senate Bill 112 on January 13, which proposes a ban on interactive games that ‘utilize multiple currency systems of payment’

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
finlandbear

The €1bn question: Does Veikkaus’ lottery monopoly signify an unfair advantage?

As Finland’s demonopolisation nears, Veikkaus’ role in the new market becomes increasingly clear, following its timely return to growth over the first half of 2026.

3 min read • • By Will Underwood
Ballys Analysis

Boom or bust: Which of Bally’s new US developments holds the most potential?

As the operator prepares to launch new casino-resorts in Las Vegas, Chicago and New York, recent concerns regarding Bally’s financials may cast doubt on each’s long-term potential. But which one offers the most?

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller
Fedbet analysis

Romania under pressure: Institutional stability should be a priority – Fedbet President

Global Gaming Insider speaks to Fedbet President Alexandru Domșa about Romania’s changing gambling landscape.

4 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic

In The News

View All
Michigan iGaming August
[ELEVATED IMPORTANCE]

Michigan iGaming, online sports betting AGR rises 11.9% to $315m for August

The state’s online sports betting handle for August decreased 2.5% from the prior year period, while Michigan’s online sports betting revenue fell 29.3% to $24.2m.

· Legal & Regulatory + 5