News

Chile casinos slam tax plan for illegal betting operators

Casino operators have accused Chilean authorities of creating a legal contradiction by taxing betting platforms that courts still consider illegal.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Casinos
Key Points
Casino industry says taxing illegal operators creates regulatory confusion
Concerns raised over consumer protection and anti-money laundering controls

Chile’s casino industry has intensified its criticism of the country’s decision to collect VAT from offshore betting operators, arguing that the policy effectively recognises an activity that remains illegal under current law.

Speaking before the Senate Economy Committee, Chilean Casino Association President Cecilia Valdés described the situation as a “giant contradiction”, questioning how the State can collect taxes from businesses it simultaneously seeks to prosecute.

Valdés argued that any discussion about taxation should come only after lawmakers establish a legal framework for online gambling.

“We must first have a law and then decide how and what to collect,” she told senators.

The comments add to a growing dispute surrounding a recent resolution from Chile’s Internal Revenue Service (SII), which created a mechanism allowing offshore betting operators serving Chilean customers to register and pay VAT.

While tax authorities have repeatedly stressed that the measure does not legalise online gambling, critics say it risks sending the opposite message to consumers and operators.

Valdés also raised concerns about consumer protection, responsible gambling measures and anti-money laundering controls. 

She revealed that the association recently consulted Chile’s Financial Analysis Unit (UAF) and was informed that offshore betting operators would not automatically be subject to suspicious transaction reporting requirements because such obligations must be established through legislation rather than administrative resolutions.

According to Valdés, that creates a gap in oversight for an activity that international organisations, including the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), have identified as potentially vulnerable to money laundering risks.

The casino sector has also questioned the fiscal logic behind the policy, arguing that VAT alone captures only a fraction of the tax revenue that could be generated under a fully regulated market. 

Good to know

Chile’s Internal Revenue Service (SII) expects to collect more than $100m annually through VAT payments from offshore online betting platforms serving Chilean customers

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
DraftKings Sportsbook

DraftKings stock down 27%: Why CEO is defending high predictions spend

During DraftKings' quarterly earnings call, Jason Robins emphasized "discipline and efficiency," coupled with a quick return on the operator's predictions investment with the operator #3 in the market. All with a July 2028 Supreme Court date in mind...

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
GammaSweep Interview: Compliance 2

GammaSweep: Why operators need a more proactive approach to compliance

Gaming firms need to incorporate compliance into their foundation, rather than responding to regulatory changes when they arise.

9 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
Midterms Predictions Analysis

Have the US Midterm Elections flipped the script on prediction markets?

Following the results of the Midterm Elections and a recent denial witnessed by Kalshi in Nevada, prediction markets could be headed for a final stand-off for their regulatory freedom.

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All