News

58% of Brazilians associate sports betting with match-fixing, survey finds

Extrapolated data from a new survey has found that most Brazilians believe betting increases the risk of match-fixing and support banning betting sponsorships in football.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Brazil bettors
Key Points
68% of respondents support banning betting sponsorship in football
58% believe betting significantly increases the risk of match-fixing
Industry representatives argue regulation and responsible advertising offer better solutions than restrictions

A majority of Brazilians believe betting has a negative impact on football and should no longer be allowed to sponsor clubs.

The results come from a new survey conducted by More in Common in partnership with Ipsos-Ipec.

The research found that 68% of respondents agreed betting sponsorship in football should be prohibited because gambling harms fans and families. 

By comparison, only 19% said sponsorship should remain because it provides important financial support to clubs.

Concerns over sporting integrity also featured prominently in the findings: 58% of respondents said betting substantially increases the risk of match-fixing due to growing public unease over the industry's role in Brazilian football.

Researchers noted that these views extend across Brazil's political divide, with respondents intending to vote for both left and right-wing: 65% of left-wing supporters backed banning betting sponsorships in football, compared with 72% of right-wing supporters.

PERCEIVED RISK OF MATCH-FIXING IN BRAZIL

To what extent do sports betting companies increase the likelihood of match-fixing in Brazilian football?

Industry representatives, however, urged caution when interpreting the findings

Bernardo Cavalcanti Freire, legal adviser to the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL), said the research has methodological limitations but acknowledged that it reflects genuine public concern about gambling risks.

“This finding, however, does not lead to the conclusion that the solution is to restrict or prohibit advertising or the activity. On the contrary. It reinforces the importance of responsible and educational advertising, carried out exclusively by authorized operators.”

Carlos Lima, President of the Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR), also recognized concerns around sporting integrity.

“One of the challenges we face today is how to effectively maintain sporting integrity. Registered operators work constantly to protect the integrity of competitions. It's a concern for everyone. It's a relevant issue for fans and the government," he said.

Good to know

The survey was conducted between July 4 and 8, interviewing 2,000 people aged 16 and over across 130 municipalities in Brazil

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
rob jones brazil

Rob Jones: What Brazil can learn from Spain, Italy and the Netherlands

The regulatory expert, a previous CLO and director at Entain, Pinnacle, Playnetic and more, says he advised caution about entering Brazil. But he remains optimistic about the country’s long-term betting future.

13 min read • • By Tim Poole
ntiacombined

NTIA Panel: The casino industry’s economic impact in times of uncertainty

The NTIA, in association with the BGC and Hippodrome Casino, explores the economic and social contribution of Britain's casinos, the potential impact of changes to Machine Games Duty and societal contributions beyond gaming.

6 min read • • By Will Underwood
Kalshi Supreme Court Analysis

Will Kalshi’s legal battle reach the US Supreme Court?

With states, Tribal interests, gaming industry groups and the NFL rallying behind New Jersey, the fight over sports prediction markets is gaining momentum. Could mounting legal pressure and conflicting court rulings persuade the US Supreme Court to intervene?

5 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic

In The News

View All