AI Summary
Sign in to listen

ACMA: Palmerbet breached Australian self-exclusion rules

The bookmaker must review its compliance systems after failing to close a self-excluded customer’s account.

1 min read
palmerbet
Key Points
Palmerbet breached Australian self-exclusion rules by continuing to provide wagering services to a BetStop-registered customer
The ACMA found 18 breaches for providing wagering services and 535 breaches relating to the failure to close the customer’s account
Palmerbet has entered an 18-month court-enforceable undertaking requiring an independent compliance review

Palmer Bookmaking, trading as Palmerbet, has entered into a court-enforceable undertaking after an Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) investigation identified breaches of national online wagering self-exclusion rules.

The investigation began following a consumer complaint and found that the individual registered with BetStop, Australia's National Self-Exclusion Register, on 2 September 2023. However, their existing Palmerbet account remained open until February 2025.

The ACMA found Palmerbet provided wagering services to the self-excluded customer on 18 separate days between 8 December 2024 and 22 February 2025. The regulator also recorded 535 contraventions relating to Palmerbet's failure to close the account as soon as practicable.

The investigation identified discrepancies between information held by Palmerbet and the customer's BetStop record. Palmerbet had used an incorrect date of birth and a shortened first name when checking the register, resulting in negative matches. The ACMA concluded that using the customer's correct information would have produced a positive match.

Palmerbet accepted 312 bets from the individual between December 2024 and February 2025. It has since repaid deposits made by the customer between their BetStop registration and the eventual closure of the account.

Under the 18-month undertaking, Palmerbet must appoint an independent consultant to review its systems, processes and practices relating to self-exclusion compliance. The company must then develop an implementation plan addressing the review's recommendations and provide further reporting to the ACMA.

Palmerbet is also required to report identified future non-compliance during the undertaking period. If it fails to comply with the undertaking, the ACMA can seek enforcement through the Federal Court.

Good to know

The customer had registered with BetStop in September 2023

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
brazil q&a

Analyst: Why Brazil iGaming ban is unlikely... but industry needs to read the room

Felipe Bondezzan, Founder of Praesidium and Brazilian regulatory specialist, has an in-depth discussion with Global Gaming Insider about sports sponsorship, aggressive advertising, influencer marketing & more. In our opinion, it is the most honest and insightful take on Brazilian gaming so far.

9 min read • • By Tim Poole
german law

What can we learn from Germany's latest hearing on illegal gambling losses?

Germany's Federal Court of Justice signals continued support for players seeking to recover losses from unlicensed online casinos, but a final ruling is not expected before early 2027, writes István Cocron.

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
finlandbear

The €1bn question: Does Veikkaus’ lottery monopoly signify an unfair advantage?

As Finland’s demonopolisation nears, Veikkaus’ role in the new market becomes increasingly clear, following its timely return to growth over the first half of 2026.

3 min read • • By Will Underwood

In The News

View All
turkey-gazette
[ELEVATED IMPORTANCE]

Turkey revokes Papel licence amid illegal betting case

The payment provider was placed under TMSF trusteeship in January, while 44 suspects were later indicted over allegations involving proceeds from illegal betting.

· Legal & Regulatory + 2