News

ACMA: Palmerbet breached Australian self-exclusion rules

The bookmaker must review its compliance systems after failing to close a self-excluded customer’s account.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
palmerbet
Key Points
Palmerbet breached Australian self-exclusion rules by continuing to provide wagering services to a BetStop-registered customer
The ACMA found 18 breaches for providing wagering services and 535 breaches relating to the failure to close the customer’s account
Palmerbet has entered an 18-month court-enforceable undertaking requiring an independent compliance review

Palmer Bookmaking, trading as Palmerbet, has entered into a court-enforceable undertaking after an Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) investigation identified breaches of national online wagering self-exclusion rules.

The investigation began following a consumer complaint and found that the individual registered with BetStop, Australia's National Self-Exclusion Register, on 2 September 2023. However, their existing Palmerbet account remained open until February 2025.

The ACMA found Palmerbet provided wagering services to the self-excluded customer on 18 separate days between 8 December 2024 and 22 February 2025. The regulator also recorded 535 contraventions relating to Palmerbet's failure to close the account as soon as practicable.

The investigation identified discrepancies between information held by Palmerbet and the customer's BetStop record. Palmerbet had used an incorrect date of birth and a shortened first name when checking the register, resulting in negative matches. The ACMA concluded that using the customer's correct information would have produced a positive match.

Palmerbet accepted 312 bets from the individual between December 2024 and February 2025. It has since repaid deposits made by the customer between their BetStop registration and the eventual closure of the account.

Under the 18-month undertaking, Palmerbet must appoint an independent consultant to review its systems, processes and practices relating to self-exclusion compliance. The company must then develop an implementation plan addressing the review's recommendations and provide further reporting to the ACMA.

Palmerbet is also required to report identified future non-compliance during the undertaking period. If it fails to comply with the undertaking, the ACMA can seek enforcement through the Federal Court.

Good to know

The customer had registered with BetStop in September 2023

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
DraftKings Sportsbook

DraftKings stock down 27%: Why CEO is defending high predictions spend

During DraftKings' quarterly earnings call, Jason Robins emphasized "discipline and efficiency," coupled with a quick return on the operator's predictions investment with the operator #3 in the market. All with a July 2028 Supreme Court date in mind...

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
GammaSweep Interview: Compliance 2

GammaSweep: Why operators need a more proactive approach to compliance

Gaming firms need to incorporate compliance into their foundation, rather than responding to regulatory changes when they arise.

9 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
Midterms Predictions Analysis

Have the US Midterm Elections flipped the script on prediction markets?

Following the results of the Midterm Elections and a recent denial witnessed by Kalshi in Nevada, prediction markets could be headed for a final stand-off for their regulatory freedom.

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All