News

Brazil's Federal Government sides with betting industry against local ad bans

A wave of municipal decrees restricting fixed-odds betting advertising is reviving a fight over who actually has the authority to regulate the sector.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Brazil Mayors
Key Points
At least five capitals and two states have introduced measures restricting betting ads, with Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte and Aracaju already passing their own rules
Rio's mayor banned betting ads in public spaces, calling operators a "plague"
Industry body ANJL has filed a lawsuit at Brazil's Supreme Court (STF) arguing that only the Federal Government has the authority to regulate advertising

Municipal decrees and bills restricting fixed-odds betting advertising are spreading across Brazil, reigniting debate over legislative authority in the sector.  

Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte and Aracaju have already passed their own rules, while São Paulo, Cuiabá, Teresina, Recife and Goiânia are considering similar proposals, a fragmented movement unfolding while the Federal Government's regulatory framework is still being implemented.

Mayors, city councilors, governors and state legislators are responding to the backlash against online betting advertising that intensified during the World Cup, arguing that the rules set by President Lula's Federal Government don't go far enough.  

The most prominent case came from Rio de Janeiro, where mayor Eduardo Cavaliere signed a decree banning betting ads in public spaces, describing betting operators as a "plague."

In Rio Grande do Sul, a state law signed in April sets advertising rules for betting platforms, including time restrictions on TV and streaming broadcasts. 

Industry representatives note that public-space advertising accounts for a small share of betting marketing spend, most of which goes toward contracts with influencers, athletes and football clubs.

To keep the issue under federal jurisdiction, the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL) has filed a direct unconstitutionality lawsuit at the Supreme Court (STF), arguing local laws create a "repugnant situation of inequality" for federally licensed operators compared with those in other states.

The Federal Government, through the Attorney General's Office (AGU), backs ANJL's position in the case, arguing that restricting advertising for licensed operators strengthens the illegal betting market, whose sites don't pay Brazil's BR30m ($5.9m) licensing fee, by reducing the visibility of authorized operators.

The AGU says its role is to defend the federative pact and ensure compliance with legal norms and that local rules create legal uncertainty for authorized companies and undermine national regulatory consistency.

Good to know

A Federal Government ordinance tightening betting advertising rules took effect recently, requiring licensed operators to display Finance Ministry warnings about the risk of financial loss and dependency

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
NFL analysis

Is the NFL against prediction markets… or tightening the pads for a regulated future?

The US football league recently argued prediction markets function in a similar fashion to traditional sports betting, despite unveiling partnerships with multiple operators who offer such trading.

5 min read • • By Kirk Geller
The black-market boogie man

The black-market boogie man: When does fear become an excuse?

Global Gaming Insider attended a discussion on the issue of illegal gambling and how operators are not completely without blame.

5 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
Belatra

Think global, play local: How player preferences are driving iGaming

Global Gaming Insider speaks with the Belatra team about localisation, regional player preferences and the trends shaping iGaming's future.

12 min read • • By Tim Poole

In The News

View All