News

Brazil betting ban: Supreme Court assigns 28 10-minute speaking slots for hearing

The Brazilian Olympic Committee and Ministry of Sport have joined the revised list of organizations that will address the provisional measure.

· 2 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
brazil-court
Key Points
Ten soccer clubs, the CBF and the Brazilian Olympic Committee occupy the opening 12 speaking slots 
Government bodies and betting associations are scheduled for the afternoon session
Each of the 28 participants has up to 10 minutes to address Provisional Measure 1,394/2026

Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) has published a detailed timetable for its public hearing on the provisional measure banning fixed-odds betting. Justice Luiz Fux's revised schedule allocates up to 10 minutes to each of 28 participating entities.

The November 3 session begins at 10 am in the STF's Second Panel courtroom. It will be broadcast by TV Justiça, Rádio Justiça and the court's YouTube channel. 

Ten soccer clubs lead the program, with Flamengo speaking first at 10:10 am, followed by Fluminense, Botafogo, Cruzeiro, São Paulo, Corinthians, Ponte Preta, Vitória, Guarani and Portuguesa.

The Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) and Brazilian Olympic Committee take the final morning slots before a break at 12:10 pm. The Attorney General's Office (AGU) opens the afternoon session at 2 pm, followed by the finance and sports ministries, the Office of the Prosecutor General and the National Confederation of Commerce.

Representatives of ANSEJA, ANJL and the Brazilian Institute for Responsible Gaming (IBJR) are also scheduled to speak. AIGAMING has the last presentation at 5 pm, with Fux due to close the proceedings 10 minutes later. A second break is scheduled from 4:10 pm to 4:40 pm.

The hearing concerns Provisional Measure 1,394/2026, which prohibits the operation, offering, intermediation and advertising of fixed-odds betting and provides for the termination of existing authorizations. 

ANJL brought direct constitutional action ADI 8027 and seeks immediate suspension of the measure and a ruling against its constitutionality.

A separate challenge from ANSEJA alleges that the measure lacked the urgency required for provisional legislation. The association also raises objections concerning legal certainty, free enterprise and the balance of federal and state powers. The court has not ruled on those arguments. 

The STF says the hearing will examine the measure's impacts. Its timetable ends with closing remarks and gives no date for a ruling. Three other direct constitutional actions also challenge the provisional measure.

Each organization may appoint up to two representatives and must submit their names and authorizations by 3 pm on October 29. Participants may also send audiovisual material ahead of their speaking slots.

An earlier court order named 26 participants when the hearing date was set. The revised timetable adds the Brazilian Olympic Committee and Ministry of Sport.

Good to know

A separate two-day STF hearing in November 2024 examined the law that established Brazil's regulated betting framework

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
marko zulj

Koom Games CEO: Why "never give up" is terrible advice for entrepreneurs

Marko Zulj explains why the ability to pivot is an entrepreneur's greatest strength, while also reflecting on our panel at the SBC Summit in Lisbon, Koom Games' aims for 2027 and future industry trends.

4 min read • • By Tim Poole
roadblock analysis

Roadblock threatens recovery: Can Bally’s help The Star navigate AU$260m setback?

The Star Entertainment Group has shown early signs of recovery, but a substantial regulatory penalty and ongoing financial uncertainties continue to cloud its outlook.

6 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic
machines duty

Paul Sculpher: The industry wasn't crying wolf – MGD rise will close shops and casinos

The Global Gaming Insider contributor and land-based gaming expert asks whether the tax rise may reduce overall tax revenue, highlighting the importance of genuine job losses.

3 min read • • By Tim Poole

In The News

View All