News

Brazil's Supreme Court sets November 3 hearing on betting ban

Justice Luiz Fux has listed 26 institutions, including government bodies, betting associations and football clubs, for a public hearing as constitutional challenges continue.

· 2 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
bra-stf
Key Points
Fux scheduled the public hearing for November 3 at 10 am in the STF's Second Panel courtroom
The order lists 26 institutions, including the Finance Ministry, betting groups, 10 football clubs and the CBF 
MP 1,394 remains before Congress, with November 23 its initial deadline for deliberation

Brazil's Supreme Federal Court (STF) has scheduled a public hearing for November 3 to consider challenges surrounding President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's provisional ban on fixed-odds betting. 

Justice Luiz Fux signed the order on October 26 in Direct Action of Unconstitutionality (ADI) 8.027. The 10 am session will take place in the courtroom of the STF's Second Panel. 

Fux said he was responding to requests from the Attorney General's Office (AGU), the applicants in ADI 8.027 and parties admitted to the proceedings.

The order lists 26 participating institutions. The government will be represented by the AGU and Finance Ministry, while industry participants include the National Association of Games and Lotteries (ANJL), Brazilian Institute of Responsible Gaming (IBJR) and National Association for the Legal Security of Games and Betting (ANSEJA).

Football will also have a substantial presence. Flamengo, Fluminense, Botafogo, Cruzeiro, São Paulo, Corinthians, Ponte Preta, Vitória, Guarani and Portuguesa are listed alongside the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF). 

Other participants include the broadcasters' association ABERT, the National Confederation of Industry and the federal prosecutor general. 

The hearing comes as several constitutional actions contest Provisional Measure 1,394/2026, which prohibits the operation, offer, intermediation and advertising of fixed-odds betting in Brazil. 

Fux directed that his order be added to six related cases. The scheduling decision does not suspend the measure or decide the legal challenges.

According to the official congressional tracker, the measure is awaiting installation of a joint committee. Its initial deadline for deliberation is November 23. That leaves the court's November 3 session 20 days before the legislative deadline, with both processes still active.

Correio Braziliense reported that the hearing will examine economic effects and legal certainty, including the impact on football. The court's participant list gives the government, betting associations and clubs an opportunity to present their positions before the measure's next legislative milestone.

Earlier this month, 23 Brazilian football clubs asked to join the STF proceedings over lost betting sponsorship income, bringing football finances into the pending constitutional challenge.

Good to know

The 26 entries in Fux's order are institutions; the document does not name 26 individual speakers or decide the ban's constitutionality

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
Jack Analysis Brazil 2

What's next for Brazil? The legal view on Lula's betting ban

Lula has won another term. Brazil’s betting ban still has to survive Congress and the courts. For operators, the fight now centers on whether prohibition becomes permanent – and what, if anything, can be salvaged…

4 min read • • By Jack Found
neil-lula

Neil Montgomery evaluates Brazil's election and the market's "unpredictable" future

Brazilian legal expert, Global Gaming Insider contributor and Montgomery Founding Partner Neil Montgomery explores the outlook for Brazilian gaming in the wake of Lula's re-election...

7 min read • • By Will Underwood
lula-react

Lula's re-election spells bleak betting outlook for Brazil...

Today is a big day for Brazil. But Lula's re-election as the nation's President is bad news for the industry... which has just under a month to launch a full-scale opposition to the online betting ban before congressional deliberation.

4 min read • • By Will Underwood

In The News

View All