ESG in gambling: Genuine shift or PR exercise?
Are ESG commitments in the gambling industry driving real change, or simply reshaping the narrative?
12 min read • Jan 19 • By
Jack Found
DYG
SPAYZ.io
GR8_TECH
OMNIPLAY
bet365 Partners
Global Gaming Awards
Galaxsys
JDB Gaming
Imagine Live
GammaPlus
BetConstruct
Vegangster
Bally’s Intralot
N1 Partners
GammaStack
Makeberry Affiliates
ReferOn
Linebet
AMATIC Online
Logifuture
Z-Gaming
GammaSweep
1spin4win
DATA.BET
Euro Games Technology
SmartSoft
ONLYPLAY
DYG
SPAYZ.io
GR8_TECH
OMNIPLAY
bet365 Partners
Global Gaming Awards
Galaxsys
JDB Gaming
Imagine Live
GammaPlus
BetConstruct
Vegangster
Bally’s Intralot
N1 Partners
GammaStack
Makeberry Affiliates
ReferOn
Linebet
AMATIC Online
Logifuture
Z-Gaming
GammaSweep
1spin4win
DATA.BET
Euro Games Technology
SmartSoft
ONLYPLAY
Are ESG commitments in the gambling industry driving real change, or simply reshaping the narrative?
Customers will be able to interact with sports betting content even outside of live event schedules.
The Monopoly-themed game will feature some of the most recognisable aspects of the game.
The live roulette game will make the luxury of Empire Casino’s tables available wherever players have an internet connection.
The executive hire follows RubyPlay’s rollout of a studio-based content ecosystem, as the supplier targets wider regulated market expansion through 2026.
In their first exclusive interview since launch, Co-Founders Gustaf Hagman and Jonas Delin talk Global Gaming Insider through Avanti Studios’ plans for live casino - but not quite as you know it.
The agreement will see the slot studio’s early portfolio rolled out across multiple regulated casino brands, extending its distribution footprint following a series of recent European market launches.
As more brands and verticals lean on pre-existing IPs to sell products, could gambling companies also find a way to use nostalgia and emotional connections to increase revenue?
The Department of Health and Social Care has told Global Gaming Insider it believes adding a disclaimer to its 'economic and social costs of harm' report would be unnecessary.
The C-77/24 case asked the question of whether player harm occurred where the customer lived and played the games, or whether it was more applicable to locate it where the online casino was licensed instead.