AI Summary
Sign in to listen

DraftKings launches online poker in Michigan following MGCB approval

DraftKings’ online poker platform is currently running through the Bay Mills Indian Community in Michigan, which serves as the state’s operator partner for the iGaming vertical.

1 min read
Online poker michigan
Key Points
Michigan joined the MSIGA in 2022 alongside Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and West Virginia
The operator’s online poker platform also went live in New Jersey and Pennsylvania following thorough regulatory reviews

The Michigan Gaming Control Board (MGCB) has approved DraftKings for a multi-state launch of its online poker platform, previously determining the operator met all regulatory requirements to conduct such activity. 

DraftKings’ online poker platform is currently running through the Bay Mills Indian Community in Michigan, which serves as the state’s operator partner for the iGaming vertical.

“This approval reflects the strength of our partnership with Bay Mills Indian Community and the thoroughness of our regulatory process,” MGCB Executive Director Henry Williams said. 

“As Michigan’s multistate poker network continues to grow, we remain focused on ensuring every operator meets the same high bar for fairness, security and player protection.”

Having also gone live in New Jersey and Pennsylvania following thorough regulatory reviews, DraftKings' online poker platform could be part of the operator’s launch in Alberta’s newly regulated iGaming market, which officially opened on July 13. 

Michigan originally joined the Multi-State Internet Gaming Agreement (MSIGA) in 2022 alongside Delaware, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Prior to joining MSIGA, online poker players were only able to compete against one another rather than access games across multiple jurisdictions. 

In additional regulatory news across Michigan, the Ingham County Circuit Court granted Attorney General Dana Nessel a temporary restraining order against Kalshi on June 29, following her original enforcement action filed against the operator in March. 

Kalshi unsuccessfully attempted to move the case to the federal level after Nessel’s motion to remand the lawsuit to state court was approved by the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan on June 25. 

Kalshi’s efforts to operator and promote prediction market offerings have now been halted in Michigan, although the case is set to continue through the court system.

Good to know

The MGCB executed a search and seizure at Games 4 U on June 10, resulting in the confiscation of 52 illegal gambling machines, $8,715 in case and 20 gift cards related to unlicensed activity

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
tribal-predict

The Tribal sector won’t back down against predictions – but at what cost?

The Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association reiterated its sector’s anti-prediction market stance this week. Yet the Kalshi x Tribal partnerships that sparked the association’s statement paint a vivid picture of fragmentation slicing right through the US gaming ecosystem.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood
sten andersen

Sten Andersen: Gambling can cross the line, but our industry leads on player protection

The ATG Chief Innovation & Future Affairs Officer speaks exclusively to Global Gaming Insider on a recent panel topic of UX, game design, player psychology and "dark patterns."

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
G2E second analysis 1

Gaming not forgotten: What may have went unseen at G2E 2026

While prediction markets dominated conversation at the tradeshow, additional headlines still made the rounds in Las Vegas – including discussions surrounding RG and operator-regulator collaboration…

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
CFTC definitions
[SIGNIFICANT IMPORTANCE]

CFTC confirms casino-style gambling products are ‘excluded’ from swap definition

The Commission stated wagers placed on sportsbooks and casino games would not be included in the definition, instead referring to sports event contracts as ‘financial instruments.’

· Legal & Regulatory + 5