News

Virginia Fonseca to stop advertising betting platforms, team confirms

Brazil's biggest influencer will no longer promote betting operators, her legal team says, following the end of her contract with Blaze.

· 1 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
Virginia Fonseca
Key Points
Virginia Fonseca's legal team confirmed she will no longer advertise betting platforms, following the end of her Blaze contract
Her team called it a personal decision tied to her current life stage and professional priorities
Fonseca remains a defendant in an MPDFT lawsuit seeking BR120m ($23m) in damages, with prosecutors alleging she earned up to 30% of bettor losses tied to her promotions

Virginia Fonseca's legal team confirmed that Brazil's biggest influencer, with more than 52 million followers, no longer intends to advertise betting platforms. 

The decision follows the recent end of her commercial relationship with Blaze. In a statement, Fonseca's legal team described the decision as personal.

"After ending the relationship with Blaze, Virginia decided not to do any new advertising for betting platforms. While she recognizes that responsible gambling is a regulated activity worldwide, this was a personal choice, related to her current life stage and the professional projects she intends to prioritize," the team said.

Fonseca's rise to prominence was closely tied to betting promotion from early on, including moments of her personal life. So much so that she earned the nickname "Tigrinia," a play on "jogo do tigrinho," the slot-style casino game Fortune Tiger that became the public face of online betting in Brazil during the sector's early boom, as it would be the one Fonseca would show followers more frequently. 

Fonseca remains a defendant in a civil public lawsuit filed by the Public Prosecutor's Office for the Federal District (MPDFT) against her and Foggo Entertainment, Blaze's parent company. 

The lawsuit followed an investigation that gathered more than 42,000 consumer complaints against Blaze, examining alleged abusive practices and how betting-related content was presented to her followers. 

Prosecutors are seeking a minimum of BR120m in collective damages. 

A separate filing alleges Fonseca's compensation could have amounted to as much as 30% of losses incurred by bettors who followed her recommendations, an arrangement prosecutors argue created a conflict of interest by financially rewarding her when consumers lost money, even though such revenue-share deals are standard within the betting industry.

Global Gaming Insider will believe it when we see it.

Good to know

The MPDFT requested advertising contracts signed between Blaze and both Virginia Fonseca and football star Neymar Jr. as part of its wider civil investigation into the operator's marketing practices

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
Delasport CEO Q&A: Canada

Alberta's long-term potential: Building a sustainable market

Oren Cohen Shwartz, CEO of Delasport, discusses the company's position in Ontario and the opportunities within the Canadian market, along with profitability amid UK tax rises.

4 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
Texas Democrats

A blue shift in Texas: What could it mean for gambling legislation?

Texas' political landscape has shifted dramatically, removing one of the biggest opponents of gambling expansion from a position of power. However, legalization remains uncertain...

4 min read • • By Marieta Lezaic
What can gambling companies learn from BlackBerry? 2

What can gambling companies learn from BlackBerry?

Who knew BlackBerry was still a tech force today? Unable to keep up the pace with mobile phone technology, the company has learned to adapt to survive... maybe even thrive.

4 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis

In The News

View All