AI Summary
Sign in to listen

23 Brazilian football clubs challenge betting ban at Supreme Court

Clubs warn that the immediate loss of sponsorship revenue threatens budgets, player wages and financial recovery plans.

1 min read
football clubs
Key Points
Flamengo estimates losses of up to BR430m ($80m) next year, while Botafogo warns the ban threatens its court-supervised recovery plan
Five clubs, including São Paulo, warn that lost sponsorship revenue could lead to salary delays and player contract terminations

At least 23 Brazilian football clubs have asked the Supreme Federal Court (STF) to join legal proceedings challenging the Government’s ban on betting.

The clubs argued that the immediate suspension of sponsorship deals threatens their financial stability.

The requests were submitted to Justice Luiz Fux, who is overseeing challenges to Provisional Measure 1,394/2026, signed by President Lula da Silva on September 25. The measure prohibits fixed-odds betting nationwide and bans related advertising and sponsorships.

Flamengo was the first club to submit a request, estimating the measure could cost it between BR400m and BR430m in revenue next year.

Botafogo filed a separate request, warning that losing its Vbet sponsorship, worth about $10m annually, could undermine its court-supervised recovery plan.

A joint filing by São Paulo, Ponte Preta, Vitória, Guarani and Portuguesa warns that lost sponsorship income could delay salaries and image-rights payments, potentially allowing players to terminate their contracts if payments remain outstanding for three months. 

São Paulo says its suspended Superbet agreement provides for BR95m in payments this year and BR678m through 2030.

A second collective filing represents 16 clubs, including Fluminense, Cruzeiro, Ceará and Goiás. The group argues smaller teams are especially exposed given their greater reliance on sponsorship income.

According to the clubs, betting companies provided more than BR1bn in sponsorships to Série A teams in 2025, representing 34% of their commercial revenue. 

They also warn the disruption could affect youth development, women’s football and Olympic and Paralympic sports, and question the lack of a transition period for existing contracts.

Good to know

The Brazilian Championship returned without betting brands on team shirts, advertising boards, pitch-side materials, backdrops or other commercial properties

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
sten andersen

Sten Andersen: Gambling can cross the line, but our industry leads on player protection

The ATG Chief Innovation & Future Affairs Officer speaks exclusively to Global Gaming Insider on a recent panel topic of UX, game design, player psychology and "dark patterns."

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
G2E second analysis 1

Gaming not forgotten: What may have went unseen at G2E 2026

While prediction markets dominated conversation at the tradeshow, additional headlines still made the rounds in Las Vegas – including discussions surrounding RG and operator-regulator collaboration…

7 min read • • By Kirk Geller
G2E Analysis 1

G2E 2026: A unified stance... or a final gaming reckoning?

At the Global Gaming Expo, prediction markets remained the talk of the town – while the Global Gaming Awards once again honored the very best performers across the Americas region.

4 min read • • By Kirk Geller

In The News

View All
viña
[STANDARD IMPORTANCE]

Chile: Authorities find casino operating despite 2023 closure order

Municipal officials and Carabineros closed a venue in Rancagua again and detained its administrator.

· Legal & Regulatory + 2