Analysis

New draft: Cooling-off rules and tax settlements to raise barriers to Austria market

Legal experts Dr. Christian Rapani and Felix Hohenthanner have reviewed a draft amendment to Austria’s Gambling Act, focusing on its implications for operators previously active under EU or EEA licences.

· 3 min read
Share this article
Follow us on Google
AI Summary
Sign in to listen
legal experts Austria
Key Points
Legal experts Dr Christian Rapani and Felix Hohenthanner provided key insights into the current draft amendment of the Austrian Gambling Act to Global Gaming Insider
The current draft states that prior activity targeting Austrian players does not automatically prevent licence eligibility, provided operators meet strict conditions on tax compliance, court judgments and transitional rules
The proposed framework also introduces a €70,000 ($79,450) application fee, a window-based licensing process and additional operational requirements, including capital and infrastructure obligations

Esteemed legal experts Dr. Christian Rapani and Felix Hohenthanner have reviewed the current draft amendment to the Austrian Gambling Act that would end the online casino monopoly currently held by state-owned Win2Day. The lawyers shared their analysis with Global Gaming Insider.

Their commentary focuses on operators that have previously offered online gambling services to Austrian players under an EU or EEA licence.

According to their assessment, the draft clarifies that prior activity involving the offering of prohibited games of chance to Austrian players, based on an EU or EEA gambling authorisation, does not, in itself, prevent the granting of a licence, provided that three conditions are met.

These conditions relate to tax compliance, the settlement of relevant civil judgments and adherence to a defined cooling-off and blocking period before a licence can be granted.

Dr. Rapani and  Hohenthanner explain that all due and not yet time-barred gaming tax must be paid on time. This requirement is also considered satisfied if the applicant, prior to expressing interest, has fully disclosed and settled all outstanding amounts through a voluntary self-disclosure process, submitting all records of stakes, payouts and bonuses in a format that allows electronic verification.

The self-disclosure process must be completed before the expression of interest is submitted and not afterwards.

They also note that all final court judgments previously issued by Austrian civil courts in favour of players against the applicant must be fully satisfied. This mainly concerns player reimbursement claims. In addition, any new judgments of this nature must be complied with within the relevant enforcement period before a licence is granted.

Dr. Rapani and Hohenthanner note that there is no finality as of yet - indeed, the interaction between the cooling-off period and blocking periods may still change in the wording of the final legislation

Cooling-off rules to determine eligibility timelines for operators seeking licence

The experts highlight that the draft introduces a structured timeline governing when operators must stop offering prohibited gambling services to Austrian players.

Operators who cease activity by 31 December 2026 would not be subject to a blocking period, with the period from 1 January 2027 until licensing treated as a cooling-off phase.

However, operators that stop after 31 December 2026 would face an 18-month exclusion period from the date of cessation. Those ceasing operations after 31 December 2029 could face a 24-month exclusion from licensing eligibility.

Rapani and Hohenthanner note that there is no finality as of yet. Indeed, the interaction between the cooling-off period and blocking periods may still change in the wording of the final legislation.

€70,000 application fee and window-based licensing process expected

They further point out that the draft sets out the basic framework for the application process. The application fee is €70,000. The licence will be issued for five years on the first grant and for ten years upon renewal. Applications are expected to be submitted within a defined application window rather than on a rolling basis.

Based on preliminary interpretation, this may indicate that licences will not be awarded on a first-come, first-served basis. Instead, all applications submitted within the same window could be assessed together with licences granted from a common cut-off date.

However, experts stress that this is a current draft and the exact design of the procedure, including the timing and duration of the application window, has not yet been confirmed and is expected to be set out in further implementing regulations.

They add that the draft also includes requirements directly relevant to operators and B2B providers preparing to enter the Austrian market. These include obligations to implement a secure server system, rules governing permitted advertising, a €10m capital requirement and other licensing conditions.

Good to know

Slot machine limits under ‘small-scale gambling,’ which covers slot machine operations at the state level, will be adjusted

Reaction Board

News Analysis

View All
macauq3big6

What Q3 financials from the 'big six' tell us about Macau's future

Following years of consistent post-Covid financial recovery, Macau's monthly revenue has declined five months running. With results from the big six now on the table, Global Gaming Insider investigates the growing disconnect between revenue, profitability and those who bucked the trend.

7 min read • • By Will Underwood
DraftKings Sportsbook

DraftKings stock down 27%: Why CEO is defending high predictions spend

During DraftKings' quarterly earnings call, Jason Robins emphasized "discipline and efficiency," coupled with a quick return on the operator's predictions investment with the operator #3 in the market. All with a July 2028 Supreme Court date in mind...

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
GammaSweep Interview: Compliance 2

GammaSweep: Why operators need a more proactive approach to compliance

Gaming firms need to incorporate compliance into their foundation, rather than responding to regulatory changes when they arise.

9 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis

In The News

View All