AI Summary
Sign in to listen

BGC responds to SMF: "Doubling Machine Games Duty would not protect those communities"

The trade body said it fundamentally opposes any rise in Machine Games Duty, arguing the think tank's report fails to account for job losses and venue closures.

2 min read
Reject
Key Points
The Betting and Gaming Council said it fundamentally opposes any increase in Machine Games Duty after the Social Market Foundation proposed a 40% rate on Category B gaming machines
The BGC said the regulated betting and gaming sector supports around 109,000 jobs and warned a duty rise would push customers toward the illegal market

The Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) said it fundamentally opposes any increase in Machine Games Duty, responding to a Social Market Foundation (SMF) report published earlier this week that proposed a new 40% duty band for Category B gaming machines.

A BGC spokesperson said: "We fundamentally oppose any increase in Machine Games Duty, and nothing in this report justifies such a damaging policy."

The BGC said bingo clubs, betting shops, casinos, working men's clubs and miners' welfare clubs play an important role in communities across the country, and that the regulated sector supports around 109,000 jobs and contributes billions to the UK economy.

The spokesperson said: "Doubling Machine Games Duty would not protect those communities. It would force venue closures, cost jobs and weaken high streets, while benefiting only the growing illegal gambling market, which pays no tax, contributes nothing to local communities and offers none of the consumer protections found in the regulated sector."

The BGC said the SMF report makes no attempt to quantify the venue closures or job losses its proposals would cause. It also pointed to the SMF's Survation polling, which found that 43% of UK adults supported higher taxes on gaming machines, while the BGC argued the results showed most people did not back an increase.

The SMF had proposed applying a 40% Machine Games Duty rate to Category B machines, found in betting shops, adult gaming centres, arcades and bingo halls, while leaving Category C and lower-stake machines unchanged. The think tank estimated the change could raise between £275m ($370m) and £458m in additional public revenue.

The proposal follows the UK Government's decision to double Remote Gaming Duty from 21% to 40% in the 2025 Autumn Budget, a move the SMF argued should now be extended to higher-stakes land-based machines linked to elevated rates of problem gambling.

Good to know

The BGC argued the SMF's own polling showed most respondents did not back higher machine taxes, although the survey found 43% supported an increase

Reaction Board

Set Global Gaming Insider to be your preferred search result

News Analysis

View All
A slap in the face - Industry reacts

“A slap in the face” – Gambling industry reacts to Brazil ban

From regulatory experts to CEOs, the sector’s verdict is in: President Lula's ban on online gambling and sports betting will create a litany of problems for the country.

4 min read • • By Patrick Fasolis
brazil sports

Brazil betting ban: Why the industry must learn lessons on a global scale

While many in our industry described an online gambling ban as an impossibility in Brazil, public fervor and national media coverage suggested it was likely all along. The sector must now acknowledge it has played this one all wrong.

7 min read • • By Tim Poole
slotegrator-analysis

Beyond the turnkey model: Slotegrator on the future of online casino

Global Gambling Insider speaks with Slotegrator CPO Alexandra Mouton to find out more about modern platform software and how operators can truly differentiate themselves in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

5 min read • • By Will Underwood

In The News

View All
G2E Panel IGA AGA
[MAJOR IMPORTANCE]

G2E: AGA, IGA leaders discuss ‘coordinated response’ to prediction market growth

According to the main stage panel, prediction markets have grown from a ‘niche financial product’ into ‘one of the most significant challenges’ currently facing Tribal sovereignty.

· Legal & Regulatory + 6